Passage II

SOCIAL SCIENCE: This passage is adapted from the article “Virtually Rebuilt, A Ruin Yields Secrets” by Sam Lubell (©2002 by The New York Times Company).

Everyone knows that the Roman Colosseum is an architectural marvel. Built so that thousands of people could be ushered in and out in minutes, it is a testament to the genius of Roman engineering. Or is it? By reconstructing the building with three-dimensional computer modeling and then virtually “walking through” it, researchers have discovered dark, narrow upper hallways that probably hemmed in spectators, slowing their movement to a crawl.

Such three-dimensional modeling is turning some of archaeology’s once-established truths on their heads. Because 3-D software can take into account the building materials and the laws of physics, it enables scholars to address construction techniques in ways sometimes overlooked when whey are working with two-dimensional drawings.

The Colosseum, a vast four-story oval arena, was built from around A.D. 70 to 80. It once held as many as 50,000 spectators. Earthquakes and the ravages of time have destroyed much of the building, but an impressive amount, including most of its facade, still stands.

Dean Abernathy, a doctoral student who helped reconstruct the Colosseum, confronted the issue of the third-level hallways. His model drew on the findings of a team of experts on Roman architecture assembled by the University of California at Los Angeles who had studied similar amphitheaters, drawings of the Colosseum and records of the building’s construction and expansion. The team also examined what was left of the upper hallways, an area that had preciously been all but closed to researchers.

Bernard Frischer, a classics professor at UCLA and director of its Cultural Virtual Reality Lab, said that researchers have generally held that the entire Colosseum was a masterpiece of circulation, with people able to enter and leave as little as 10 minutes. After touring the virtual Colosseum, now he is not so sure. “Most scholars just never focused on the problem of circulation throughout the building,” he said. “They assumed that each of the floors was going to look like bottom,” which is spacious and well lighted.

Such reconstructions have challenged traditional thinking about other sites as well. Analysis of UCLA models suggests that the Roman Senate may have been poorly ventilated and lighted and had inferior acoustics. The models also raised some new questions about the Temple of Saturn, whose design may have been altered centuries after its construction.

Samuel Paley, a classics professor at the States University of New York at Buffalo, and members of the virtual reality lab there have worked with a design company that specializes in archaeological visualizations to produce virtual models of several Assyrian palaces. Moving through a simulation of the northwest palaces of Ashur-Nasir-Pal II Assyria, an ancient site in relief sculptures in a row. The sculptures, which depicted a ritual involving the king, courtiers and protective gods, could be viewed as a single, isolated tableau only from his position on the threshold of the throne room—as was evidently the intention of the palace’s designers. When Paley described his findings at a lecture, “the room went absolutely silent,” he said, “I think people realized right then that this is a useful technology that helps them things in a different way.”

Some experts hesitate to rely on such modeling, saying that it can gloss over the realities of the past. Kenneth Koison, deputy director of the division of research programs for the National Endowment for the Humanities, said that virtual images conveyed a “false sense of integrity and purity.” He added. “Those images, especially the stunningly seductive ones, conveys as much or more about our own values and cultural aspirations as about the ancients.”

Even Feischer and other scholars who have embraced interactive 3-D modeling caution that their reconstructions can never be accepted as fast, partly because new information is always surfacing. “We’re looking the stuff out,” said Mark Wilson Jones, a member of the UCLA committee of Roman architecture. “Nothing’s ever final.” One advantage of using digital models, scholars say, is that they can easily be updated with new findings.

Fikret Yegul, a professor of architectural history at the University of California at Santa Barbara, acknowledges that computer modeling can shed new light on the past. Still, he questions some of the theories of the team of expert assembled by UCLA. “VA models can never be seen as the last word,” he said. “They are only another perspective.”