4. Which set of data best supports the claim that Site 1 has lower water quality than Site 2?

Answer and Explanation

Your Answer is

Correct Answer is F

Explanation

If BI is not considered, the more E. coli, the worse the water quality should be. Therefore, it can be seen from figure 1 that the number of E. coli in Site 1 far exceeds the number of E. coli in Site 2, so it can be seen that the water quality in Site 1 is worse