11. Suppose that in Study 1 the students had measured the absorbance at wavenumbers from 600 cm-1 through only 1,600 cm-1 (instead of through 1,800 cm-1). Based on Figure 1, would the students more likely have measured the absorbance in Study 2 at a wavenumber of 1,172 cm-1or at a wavenumber of 1,464 cm-1?

Answer and Explanation

Your Answer is

Correct Answer is B

Explanation

First of all, it is necessary to understand why the absorbance at the wavelength of 1746 cm-1 is measured in figure 2. It can be seen from figure 1 that at the wavelength of 1746 cm-1, the absorbance of BD and PD is significantly different, so it is easiest to distinguish these two substances;

Looking at figure 1, it is found that when the abscissa When the wavenumber is in the range of 1400-1500, the absorbance of BD and PD is very close, so it is difficult to distinguish BD and PD. Therefore, it is recommended to measure the wavelength of 1172 cm-1, because at this time the distinction between BD and PD is obvious, and the absorbance of BD is much higher than that of PD, so it is easy to detect the influence of the change of BD content in the mixture on the absorbance