31. The main purpose of this passage is to:
Your Answer is
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
This article focuses on which massive growth organisms failed and which ones succeeded?
ABC item: Too much detail is not the main purpose of the article.
Passage IV
NATURAL SCIENCE: This passage is adapted from the article “The Next Wave: What Makes an Invasive Species Stick?” by Robert R. Dunn (©2010 by Natural History Magazine, Inc.).
Like many biologists, Andrew V. Suarez struggled for years with the question of which colonizing organisms fail and which succeed. He studied it the hard way—with fieldwork and lab experiments一until 1999, when he found some brown jars. He had gone to the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History’s National Insect Collection to look for early samples of Argentine ants collected in the United States or at its borders. He hoped to find out how vintage specimens of Argentine ants were related to the existing populations.
At the museum, among many thousands of jars of insects labeled with taxonomic notes, locations, and dates, Suarez ultimately found relatively few samples of Argentine ants. But what he found besides them was, to his mind, far more interesting: some of the ethanol-filled jars were jammed with vials of ants collected at ports of entry in the eastern U.S. from 1927 to 1985. They were ants that border agents had picked from plants being shipped into the U.S. Could those ants be identified as members of species that had failed or succeeded as colonists, and if so, could the specimens be used to compare the two groups?
In the jars and vials were 394 separate samples of ants. Suarez solicited the help of two friends, ant ecologist David A. Holway of the University of California, San Diego, and Philip S. Ward, guru of ant gurus, at the University of California, Davis. Altogether they identified 232 distinct species.
Suarez considered the traits possessed by each of the ant species in an attempt to see what might have predisposed some of them to survival. He measured whether they were big or small. He examined whether each lived in the canopy or on the ground, and whether they were from one subfamily or another. He also looked at a simpler possibility: that “survivor species” tended to be those introduced more than once. The evidence in the jars showed, for example, that Argentine ants had arrived at least twice. Were successes just a consequence of the number of tries?
When a pioneering group sets up camp and starts living in a new place, possible futures diverge. One species might be wiped out within a generation or two. A second might survive, but never become common. Yet another species might thrive, eventually spreading across states, continents, and even the world! Even if surviving in a new environment is sometimes a matter of being introduced again and again, thriving is a different story. Relatively few invasive species truly prevail.
One curious thing about Argentine ants is that they are, despite their apparent meekness, ecologically dominant. They are squishy, small, stingless wimps, as ants go, yet somehow they have managed to overpower the big, tough native ants.
There’s another strange thing about Argentine ants. If you take an Argentine ant from what looks like one colony and put it together with one from a distant colony, they accept each other. In fact, you can perform that trick over much of California and very few of the ants will fight. It is as though all of the Argentine ants in California are part of a few huge colonies—"super-colonies," they’ve come to be called.
Biologist Ted Case joined forces with Holway and Suarez for an experiment to test whether the lack of aggression among those ant colonies somehow helped them to compete with other species. Might it simply be that by not fighting with their neighbors, the Argentine ants wasted less energy on war and could spend more time on the good stuff? It turned out that, yes, aggressive ants wasted energy fighting (and dying), and so gathered less food and fared poorly, in general. Peace pays (at least peace with one’s kin), and so Argentine ants have made bank everyplace they have moved.
In fact, it isn’t just for the Argentine ant that peace seems to pay. Supercolonies and the unicolonial populations they create look to be common among invasive ants.
Ants flash chemical badges identifying their home nest. Without such markers, no one knows who is friend or foe. When the clarity of “us versus them” breaks down, peace breaks out among colonies of an ant species. Different nests swap workers and queens, and the term “colony” becomes fuzzy. Experiments seemed to show that one conglomeration of Argentine ants stretched the length of California, another from Italy to Portugal ... until, in 2009, workers from those two “colonies” (along with a third from Japan) were put together, and they didn’t fight. Thus, across the entire globe, a few peaceful supercolonies could exist and expand.
31. The main purpose of this passage is to:
Your Answer is
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
This article focuses on which massive growth organisms failed and which ones succeeded?
ABC item: Too much detail is not the main purpose of the article.